I have long wondered why Mount Kilimanjaro is marketed as an uncomplicated tourist activity, presented as broadly accessible and almost routine, even though it is a high altitude environment where the margin for error is narrow and the consequences of poor decisions can be serious. The idea that it is a mountain almost anyone can climb with enough determination has become so normalized that it rarely invites scrutiny, despite the way it shapes pricing, itineraries, and expectations.
The more time I have spent around Kilimanjaro, the clearer it has become that safety on the mountain is largely determined long before anyone sets foot on the trail. It is built into choices about itinerary length, acclimatization pace, group size, staffing, and the pressure placed on reaching the summit. These decisions are often made far from Tanzania, guided by marketing narratives and cost considerations rather than by the realities of operating at altitude.
When incidents occur, responsibility does not fall evenly across an expedition. It concentrates on local guides and porters who must manage health emergencies, rapidly changing weather, and difficult judgment calls in an environment where mistakes have immediate consequences. Kilimanjaro depends entirely on local labor, yet the dominant narrative continues to frame the climb as an individual achievement rather than a collective effort sustained by the experience and risk borne by others.
Most guides, assistant guides, cooks, and porters work as freelancers, paid per climb and dependent on seasonal demand. Despite this uncertainty, they carry the greatest responsibility on the mountain. They monitor acclimatization, recognize early signs of altitude illness, and decide when to slow down or turn back. Their judgment is what keeps people safe, yet the pressure to deliver summits often overrides the authority their role requires.
This is where ethical questions emerge. When climbs are rushed to reduce costs or to protect summit success rates, risk does not disappear but is transferred downward to those with the least power to refuse it. Framing Kilimanjaro as simple or universally accessible allows these dynamics to remain largely invisible, even though they shape outcomes on the mountain.
Over time, this has led me to question how a responsible Kilimanjaro climb should be designed. Rather than measuring success primarily by whether the summit is reached, a well designed expedition prioritizes adequate acclimatization, manageable group sizes, and leadership structures that respect local expertise. Within this approach, porter welfare is not a secondary concern but a central element of safety for everyone involved.
I also believe responsibility should not end at the park gate. Kilimanjaro exists within a lived landscape shaped by communities whose lives are affected by tourism and environmental change. When climbs conclude without any engagement beyond wages and park fees, they remain extractive in practice, even when intentions are good. Some expeditions now extend the journey beyond the descent by connecting climbers with practical, community led initiatives, such as clean energy access, that respond to real needs and are implemented through local systems.
Because of these experiences, I wrote a comprehensive guide that examines how Kilimanjaro climbing is structured, how safety and labor intersect, and why responsibility should extend beyond the summit rather than ending at the gate. The full analysis is on my website: Climbing Mount Kilimanjaro With Purpose: A Responsible Guide to Safety and Community Impact.
For those working in adventure travel or expedition design, the question is no longer simply whether people should continue climbing Kilimanjaro, but whether summit success should remain the primary measure of a good climb, or whether the model itself needs to change.
+ 209 others joined this month
Comments
My name is Anniina Sandberg. I am an anthropologist and the founder of Visit Natives, a travel company focused on community led and field based experiences. I have worked in Northern Tanzania and around Mount Kilimanjaro, spending time with mountain crews and communities connected to the tourism economy there.
I wrote this piece after repeatedly seeing how safety on Kilimanjaro is shaped less by individual climbers and more by structural decisions made long before anyone reaches the mountain. This article is a shortened reflection on those observations. I have also written a much more comprehensive guide that looks in detail at how Kilimanjaro climbing is designed, how labor and safety intersect, and what responsibility can realistically look like beyond the summit, which I link to in the post for anyone who wants to go deeper:
www.visitnatives.com/post/climbing-mount-kilimanjaro-with-purpose-a-responsible-guide-to-safety-and-community-impact
I would genuinely welcome perspectives from others working in adventure travel, guiding, or expedition design. Where do you think responsibility on a mountain like Kilimanjaro should begin, and where should it end?
Thousands of travelers fly to Tanzania every year to attempt to climb the highest point on the African continent, Mount Kilimanjaro (5.895 meters). Some of them return home without reaching the summit. This happens for a variety of reasons,
>One is to forget that Kilimanjaro climbing isn't something you can do it by yourself you need a crew and crew need you as well, As Kilimanjaro local Toour Guide over experience of 10 years and above I have this statements during a brief to my team and cleats.
>The mountain never bows down for anyone, so please I have special request
>SPECIAL REQUEST: Please, remember we are all climbing as a team and a family and therefore should be ready and willing to assist each other during the trekking whenever the need arises.