For years, India itineraries have started with the Golden Triangle; Delhi, Agra and Jaipur.
It still works well for first-time visitors. The history is powerful, the monuments are iconic, and the logistics are easy. But something interesting is happening with repeat travellers.
Over the past year, I’ve had three separate enquiries from travellers who started the conversation the same way:
“I’ve already done Delhi, Agra and Jaipur. What else is there?”
Ten years ago, that question was rare. Today, I’m hearing it more often, especially from travellers who have visited India once before and want something different the second time.
One couple from Britain, who are mad crazy about India (having visited almost 9 times), told me they still wish to explore the unseen side of the country. They were open to experimenting with "Slow Travel" — something they had heard about but never really tried. So instead of moving every two nights, I curated a journey in a lesser-known region of India where they stayed five nights in one place
They spent time in vineyards, old towns, village homes, and local markets. Met and interacted with humble small-town locals, shared stories and created moments that felt authentic and not rushed.
Their feedback was simple: “This felt like an India we never imagined”.
The Golden Triangle still works, especially for first-time visitors, but I’m noticing a shift with repeat travellers. Many are less interested in monuments alone and more interested in context, community and slower pacing.
At our tour company Unfollow Travel (unfollowtravel.com) we're seeing growing interest in regions that feel slower and more lived-in; places where travellers can spend time with local farmers, visit archaeological sites without crowds, understand regional food traditions, or simply stay longer in one place.
Are others seeing similar patterns with repeat India clients?
For operators designing India journeys, this opens an important question: Are we still selling India as a checklist or are we ready to design it as a layered experience?
Very interesting question, Sayali. There are many perspective to this. From what I have observed, travelers have evolved and want to experiment. I have had conversations with travelers who spend two days in Jaipur but did not feel like visiting tourist attractions, there are many who pick what interest them, and so on. I'm so surprised to know that most mainstream travel companies want travelers to experience the cliche images that they might have seen and hammer this over and over again. The fact is travelers have evolved a lot. I certainly can share more.
Thanks for sharing that perspective. I completely relate to what you’re saying about travellers becoming more selective with their time.
I’ve noticed something similar with repeat visitors. Many are not necessarily trying to “see everything” anymore. Instead, they’re choosing experiences that feel meaningful to them.
What you mentioned about people spending two days in Jaipur and not feeling the need to visit all the major attractions is interesting, because it reflects a shift from checklist travel to more personal exploration.
I also sometimes feel the industry still leans heavily on the familiar images of India that have worked for decades. Like sticking to the "syllabus". But travellers themselves seem to be moving beyond that.
Would love to hear more examples from your side. Especially what kind of experiences travellers are asking for now.
I have been doing offbeat and more behind the scene walking tours in Jaipur. There are many travel curators who absolutely love the idea and have hopped on, going with travel trends and client preferences. I find it rather "curious" that some travel companies just want to "stick" to showing crowded streets and bazaars because this has been "fed" to people in certain nations. It is as if they have stereotyped travelers & things they want to experience. Based on experience, I can say with certainty travelers have individual preferences.
It reminds me of a conversation I have had a few years ago with an expat who shifted to India (she now runs a travel company but back then she didn't). We both agreed that mainstream travel industry prefers to stick to what has been "followed" for years. While travelers had evolved, the industry didn't. This has changed in the last few years. But it is small and new travel companies that are bringing in this change. The focus has shifted from ticking list to experiences.
Since you asked what travelers are asking for, from what I understand people are open to new experiences. This includes workshops, walks, etc. Just to give an example, some are even curious about the lives of people, how city wakes up, etc. There are many untapped opportunities and authentic experiences to curate. Something that I have been thinking about!
Hi Sayali, great post that resonates strongly with me. The shift from checklist to context is real, and it's one of the most interesting design challenges in luxury India travel right now.
What I'd add is that slower, deeper itineraries actually demand more from the operator, not less. Spending five nights in one lesser-known region sounds simple but requires genuine local relationships, trusted introductions, and the kind of on-ground knowledge that only comes from years of working that specific geography. The logistics of 'slow' are often harder than the logistics of moving every two nights between well-trodden stops.
The good news is that repeat travellers who want this are also usually more trusting of their operator's judgment. They've done the monuments and they're ready to be led somewhere unexpected.
Curious to know, are you finding clients need much convincing to try a slower pace, or does the idea sell itself once you frame it right?
Slow travel often looks simple from the outside, but in reality it demands much deeper groundwork from the operator. Staying longer in one region means the experience has to hold the traveller’s curiosity beyond the typical sightseeing circuit.
In my experience, once the idea is explained well, most repeat travellers don’t need much convincing. Many of them are actually relieved to hear that they don’t have to rush from one monument to another.
Thoughtful design is very important though. Including culture, food, landscapes, conversations with locals, and everyday life. When those elements come together, the slower pace starts making complete sense to them.
And as you rightly said, repeat travellers are often the most trusting. Having already seen the highlights, they’re much more open to letting the journey unfold in a less predictable way.
It is true that deep knowledge is necessary to plan such itineraries. One also needs to keep updated with the city since these days changes are very fast. Also important is understanding of the client and their preferences. Very few travel curators have deep knowledge of destinations.
From my experience, it is seasoned travelers who love the idea of slow and immersive travel. There are exceptions, of course.
I missed mentioning that there are many repeat travelers to Jaipur for sure. The city has become a big center for destination weddings, corporate events, art & craft workshops etc. The absolute numbers are rising and as for the repeat travel, there are no numbers to share but I do come across people who are frequent visitors to Jaipur (for leisure)
Rajasthan will never face any shortage of tourists. It is the image of Indian Tourism. That and the Taj Mahal. But the idea is how to bring the same travellers to the other unique regions of the country and introduce them to hyperlocal experiences.
+ 194 others joined this month
Comments
For years, India itineraries have started with the Golden Triangle; Delhi, Agra and Jaipur.
It still works well for first-time visitors. The history is powerful, the monuments are iconic, and the logistics are easy. But something interesting is happening with repeat travellers.
Over the past year, I’ve had three separate enquiries from travellers who started the conversation the same way:
“I’ve already done Delhi, Agra and Jaipur. What else is there?”
Ten years ago, that question was rare. Today, I’m hearing it more often, especially from travellers who have visited India once before and want something different the second time.
One couple from Britain, who are mad crazy about India (having visited almost 9 times), told me they still wish to explore the unseen side of the country. They were open to experimenting with "Slow Travel" — something they had heard about but never really tried. So instead of moving every two nights, I curated a journey in a lesser-known region of India where they stayed five nights in one place
They spent time in vineyards, old towns, village homes, and local markets. Met and interacted with humble small-town locals, shared stories and created moments that felt authentic and not rushed.
Their feedback was simple: “This felt like an India we never imagined”.
The Golden Triangle still works, especially for first-time visitors, but I’m noticing a shift with repeat travellers. Many are less interested in monuments alone and more interested in context, community and slower pacing.
At our tour company Unfollow Travel (unfollowtravel.com) we're seeing growing interest in regions that feel slower and more lived-in; places where travellers can spend time with local farmers, visit archaeological sites without crowds, understand regional food traditions, or simply stay longer in one place.
Are others seeing similar patterns with repeat India clients?
For operators designing India journeys, this opens an important question: Are we still selling India as a checklist or are we ready to design it as a layered experience?
Very interesting question, Sayali. There are many perspective to this. From what I have observed, travelers have evolved and want to experiment. I have had conversations with travelers who spend two days in Jaipur but did not feel like visiting tourist attractions, there are many who pick what interest them, and so on. I'm so surprised to know that most mainstream travel companies want travelers to experience the cliche images that they might have seen and hammer this over and over again. The fact is travelers have evolved a lot. I certainly can share more.
Thanks for sharing that perspective. I completely relate to what you’re saying about travellers becoming more selective with their time.
I’ve noticed something similar with repeat visitors. Many are not necessarily trying to “see everything” anymore. Instead, they’re choosing experiences that feel meaningful to them.
What you mentioned about people spending two days in Jaipur and not feeling the need to visit all the major attractions is interesting, because it reflects a shift from checklist travel to more personal exploration.
I also sometimes feel the industry still leans heavily on the familiar images of India that have worked for decades. Like sticking to the "syllabus". But travellers themselves seem to be moving beyond that.
Would love to hear more examples from your side. Especially what kind of experiences travellers are asking for now.
Sayali,
I have been doing offbeat and more behind the scene walking tours in Jaipur. There are many travel curators who absolutely love the idea and have hopped on, going with travel trends and client preferences. I find it rather "curious" that some travel companies just want to "stick" to showing crowded streets and bazaars because this has been "fed" to people in certain nations. It is as if they have stereotyped travelers & things they want to experience. Based on experience, I can say with certainty travelers have individual preferences.
It reminds me of a conversation I have had a few years ago with an expat who shifted to India (she now runs a travel company but back then she didn't). We both agreed that mainstream travel industry prefers to stick to what has been "followed" for years. While travelers had evolved, the industry didn't. This has changed in the last few years. But it is small and new travel companies that are bringing in this change. The focus has shifted from ticking list to experiences.
What do you have to say, Sayali?
Since you asked what travelers are asking for, from what I understand people are open to new experiences. This includes workshops, walks, etc. Just to give an example, some are even curious about the lives of people, how city wakes up, etc. There are many untapped opportunities and authentic experiences to curate. Something that I have been thinking about!
Hi Sayali, great post that resonates strongly with me. The shift from checklist to context is real, and it's one of the most interesting design challenges in luxury India travel right now.
What I'd add is that slower, deeper itineraries actually demand more from the operator, not less. Spending five nights in one lesser-known region sounds simple but requires genuine local relationships, trusted introductions, and the kind of on-ground knowledge that only comes from years of working that specific geography. The logistics of 'slow' are often harder than the logistics of moving every two nights between well-trodden stops.
The good news is that repeat travellers who want this are also usually more trusting of their operator's judgment. They've done the monuments and they're ready to be led somewhere unexpected.
Curious to know, are you finding clients need much convincing to try a slower pace, or does the idea sell itself once you frame it right?
Hi Nupur,
I completely agree with your point.
Slow travel often looks simple from the outside, but in reality it demands much deeper groundwork from the operator. Staying longer in one region means the experience has to hold the traveller’s curiosity beyond the typical sightseeing circuit.
In my experience, once the idea is explained well, most repeat travellers don’t need much convincing. Many of them are actually relieved to hear that they don’t have to rush from one monument to another.
Thoughtful design is very important though. Including culture, food, landscapes, conversations with locals, and everyday life. When those elements come together, the slower pace starts making complete sense to them.
And as you rightly said, repeat travellers are often the most trusting. Having already seen the highlights, they’re much more open to letting the journey unfold in a less predictable way.
It is true that deep knowledge is necessary to plan such itineraries. One also needs to keep updated with the city since these days changes are very fast. Also important is understanding of the client and their preferences. Very few travel curators have deep knowledge of destinations.
From my experience, it is seasoned travelers who love the idea of slow and immersive travel. There are exceptions, of course.
I missed mentioning that there are many repeat travelers to Jaipur for sure. The city has become a big center for destination weddings, corporate events, art & craft workshops etc. The absolute numbers are rising and as for the repeat travel, there are no numbers to share but I do come across people who are frequent visitors to Jaipur (for leisure)
Rajasthan will never face any shortage of tourists. It is the image of Indian Tourism. That and the Taj Mahal. But the idea is how to bring the same travellers to the other unique regions of the country and introduce them to hyperlocal experiences.