As a small, on-ground operator with strong background in curating locally rooted experiences, I often wonder how international travel curators make this choice. From the outside, it seems many prefer starting with established DMCs or the big names.
Is it because of structure and reliability? Or simply better pricing and ease of scale?
Smaller operators often bring deeper local insight, flexibility, and more rooted experiences; but what actually drives someone to take that first step and work with them?
What builds enough confidence to experiment and give a smaller, locally rooted partner a chance over a larger name following a more standard approach?
Do you see value in this, or is it something you approach cautiously?
+ 217 others joined this month
Comments
A question I’ve been thinking about lately.
As a small, on-ground operator with strong background in curating locally rooted experiences, I often wonder how international travel curators make this choice. From the outside, it seems many prefer starting with established DMCs or the big names.
Is it because of structure and reliability?
Or simply better pricing and ease of scale?
Smaller operators often bring deeper local insight, flexibility, and more rooted experiences; but what actually drives someone to take that first step and work with them?
What builds enough confidence to experiment and give a smaller, locally rooted partner a chance over a larger name following a more standard approach?
Do you see value in this, or is it something you approach cautiously?
Would love to hear your thoughts.