Reactions
Where should AI stop and the human take over in trip planning?
Where should AI stop and the human take over in trip planning?
was posted by Aaron
in
Discussion
,
AI
,
Planning
.
Featured on Jul 22, 2026 (24 days ago).
This post is not rated yet.
Sharing is caring
QR Code
Welcome to Travel Massive!
Discover new ideas in travel and join our global community of innovators and thought leaders. Learn more.
+ 408 others joined this month
Comments
I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Planning a trip used to mean hours (sometimes days) of YouTube vlogs, Reddit threads, and blog posts, piecing together a day-by-day plan from a dozen different sources. Some people genuinely love that process. Others just want to get to the good part: the trip itself. I'm one of the people who love creating travel itineraries.
One question has been sitting in the back of my mind while building a travel planner app: what part of trip planning do people actually enjoy?
When I ask friends why they love planning a trip, almost nobody says it's because they enjoy comparing exchange rates, checking opening hours, figuring out which neighborhoods make sense geographically, or discovering that a restaurant they saved closed three years ago.
What they enjoy is imagining themselves there. Finding the café they'd happily spend an afternoon in. Discovering a neighborhood they hadn't heard of. Choosing between hiking through a national park or wandering local markets. The excitement comes from the possibilities — not from the logistics.
That distinction has changed the way I think about AI in travel. Rather than replacing the planning process, I think AI is most valuable when it quietly handles the repetitive work in the background:
• Organizing days geographically instead of zigzagging across a city
• Checking whether attractions are actually open
• Factoring in weather, budgets, transit times, and local events
• Suggesting alternatives when plans change
The human still decides what kind of trip they want. AI simply makes it easier to build that trip.
Of course, there are risks. If every itinerary comes from the same prompt, every traveler starts seeing the same restaurants, the same viewpoints, and the same "hidden gems." That's not discovery — it's another algorithmic feed.
I've been experimenting with ways to avoid that by grounding recommendations in real places and encouraging neighborhood-level exploration instead of checklist tourism. It's made me realize the hardest part isn't generating an itinerary — it's preserving the feeling that you're discovering a place rather than having it dictated to you.
I've been testing this with a small app I'm building on the side (Routinex.Travel) using my own family trips, and it's made me curious where other people land.
Does having an AI generate the framework free you up to focus on the parts you actually care about — flights, hotel, that one restaurant you've been wanting to try? Or does it strip out something valuable about the planning process itself?
So I'm curious how others in the travel industry see it, especially those of you closer to the content/creator side. As AI becomes a bigger part of travel planning, where do you think the line is? What parts of planning should always remain human, and what parts are you happy to hand over to AI?
You're right about discovering a place rather than having it dictated. I like to think about it in terms of how easy it is to "undo" something that AI might decide on. A restaurant or cafe? Easy to "undo" that decision and go walk across the street if the IRL result is not what you expected. Booking a flight or hotel with AI? A bit harder to "undo" those parts if AI makes the mistake.
Personally I enjoy booking flights, mostly because it's a fun mental exercise to piece together the routes and times and explore all the different ways to get there.
On the ground, I don't plan a thing and I almost never have. Cities are natural guides — observing the public transport, lights, busy streets, local connections and some common sense almost always gets you to a great spot.
A few relevant reads on this:
IMHO the line is RECOMMENDATIONS (hotels, restaurants, activities etc.)
Not only because it's the part of trip planning people enjoy...but also because AI just summarizes what the internet says...the best recos are HUMAN!
That's exactly why I started Triprecos (triprecos.com)...people don't trust AI for travel recommendations.
A recent SKIFT article sums it up well:
skift.com/2026/07/23/travel-ai-trust-report/
AI has been proven wrong on numerous occasions when planning trips. As a travel advisor, I'm part of a huge community of fellow travel advisors through ASTA and can ask for real feedback on places, speak directly to the travel suppliers when issues arise to handle it, and go above and beyond to help clients find exactly the right travel experience for them based on what they're interested in. I find AI can only do so much and it's rather impersonal. Just my take.:)